Enforcement Seizure Quashed Due to Defective Bailiff's Report on Domicile

A party appealed a lower court's decision that had ordered the seizure and sale of property in enforcement of a debt, arguing the original judgment was invalid because it was based on an improperly served bailiff's report that failed to properly identify the debtor's domicile. The high court quashed the decision, reasoning that while the service of the initial enforcement document was valid, the underlying judgment enforcing the obligation was based on a bailiff's report that did not strictly adhere to the procedural requirements regarding the precise mention of the debtor's domicile, which rendered the basis for the enforcement measure defective.