Legislator Case Law & Legislation
TT 2017:120 AI generated

Union appeal dismissed; court upheld employer's right to terminate contract without notice for serious misconduct.

Case Number TT 2017:120
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Labour Court rejected the union's appeal against the termination of an employee's contract by Baltic Bulk Oy. The employee was found guilty of serious misconduct, including theft and unauthorized absence, which justified immediate dismissal under Finnish labor law. Consequently, the court ruled that the employer was not required to provide notice or severance pay for such fundamental breaches.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 10 of the Employment Contracts Act; Section 10 of the Act on the Termination of Employment Contracts: An employer may terminate an employment contract without notice or severance pay if the employee commits a serious breach of duty, such as theft or prolonged unauthorized absence.

Keywords

AI generated
serious misconduct termination unauthorized absence theft in employment notice period waiver severance pay exemption labor court appeal employee breach of duty

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 10 of the Employment Contracts Act
Section 10 of the Act on the Termination of Employment Contracts
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kanteen peruutus.

KANTAJA

Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry

VASTAAJA

Baltic Bulk Oy