Union appeal dismissed; court rejects claim that employer must provide alternative work for union member on strike.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Labour Court dismissed the union's appeal against the termination of a member who was on strike. The employer argued that the employee's strike action constituted a valid reason for dismissal under collective agreement rules, while the union contended that the employee was entitled to alternative work. The court ruled that the employer was not obligated to provide alternative work to a striking employee and upheld the termination as lawful under the relevant collective agreement. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, confirming the employer's right to dismiss the employee for strike participation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedSection 1 of the Collective Agreements Act; Section 10 of the Collective Agreement for the Transport and Logistics Sector: An employer is not required to provide alternative work to an employee participating in a strike, and dismissal for such participation is permissible under the collective agreement.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kanteen peruutus.
KANTAJA
Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry
VASTAAJA
Loviisan Ahtaus Oy