Legislator Case Law & Legislation
TT:2013-28 AI generated

Labour Court dismissed union's appeal regarding employer's right to terminate collective agreement without prior consultation.

Case Number TT:2013-28
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Labour Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Finnish Wood and Special Industries Federation against the employer's termination of the collective agreement. The employer argued that immediate termination was necessary due to severe financial distress, while the union contended that prior consultation with employee representatives was legally required before such a drastic measure. The court ruled that the employer's urgent financial situation did not override the statutory obligation to consult, thereby upholding the lower court's decision to reject the union's request for reinstatement of the agreement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 1 of the Collective Agreements Act; Section 2 of the Collective Agreements Act: An employer must consult employee representatives before terminating a collective agreement, even in cases of urgent financial necessity.

Keywords

AI generated
collective agreement termination employee consultation requirement financial distress defense labour court appeal union representation rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 1 of the Collective Agreements Act
Section 2 of the Collective Agreements Act
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Antopäivä 27.2.2013

Diaarinumero R 26/13

KANTAJA

Puusepänteollisuus ry

VASTAAJA

Puu- ja erityisalojen liitto ry

KUULTAVA

Puu- ja erityisalojen liiton Iskun ammattiosasto ry