Legislator Case Law & Legislation
TT:2012-28 AI generated

Labour Court dismissed collective agreement breach claim due to lack of evidence regarding specific breach terms.

Case Number TT:2012-28
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Labour Court dismissed the collective agreement breach claim filed by TEAM against Tamglass and Kulutustavararyhmä. TEAM alleged violations of the collective agreement, but the court found no sufficient evidence to substantiate these specific allegations. Consequently, the claim was rejected because the plaintiff failed to prove the existence of the alleged breaches.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Työehtosopimuslain 1 luku; Työehtosopimuslain 10 luku: A claim for breach of a collective agreement is dismissed when the plaintiff fails to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the alleged specific violations.

Keywords

AI generated
collective agreement breach labour court dismissal burden of proof failure TEAM union claim Tamglass breach allegation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Työehtosopimuslain 1 luku
Työehtosopimuslain 10 luku

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Antopäivä 23.2.2012

Diaarinro R 111/11

TYÖTUOMIOISTUIN PÄÄTÖS Nro 28

KANTAJA

TEAM Teollisuusalojen ammattiliitto ry

VASTAAJAT

Kulutustavararyhmä ry

Tamglass Lasinjalostus Oy

ASIA

Työehtosopimuksen tieten rikkominen ym.