Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 824/2005 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal to remove suspension due to lack of proof regarding receipt of summons.

Case Number KKO 824/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal seeking to remove the suspension of a property division proceeding. The respondent argued they never received the summons sent by post, yet the court found the suspension valid because the respondent was absent from the scheduled hearing. The court ruled that without evidence proving the summons was not received, the procedural requirements for lifting the suspension were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Kiinteistönmuodostamislain 168 § 1 momentti; Kiinteistönmuodostamislain 169 § 2 momentti; Kiinteistönmuodostamislain 170 § 1 momentti: A suspension in a property division proceeding may be lifted only if the party proves they did not receive the summons; mere assertion of non-receipt without evidence does not satisfy the statutory requirement for removal of the suspension.

Keywords

AI generated
property division suspension summons receipt evidence procedural due process appeal dismissal non-appearance hearing

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Kiinteistönmuodostamislain 168 § 1 momentti
Kiinteistönmuodostamislain 169 § 2 momentti
Kiinteistönmuodostamislain 170 § 1 momentti
AI generated
kko-precedent_2006_85
Supreme Court allows compensation claim for wrongful detention where post delivery notice was not proven received.
kko-precedent_1998_95
Supreme Court reverses High Court for failing to allow appealant access to trial documents before ruling.
appeal_1984_turku__873
Company meeting decision voided because invitation was sent via door post instead of registered mail as required by articles of association.
kko-other_1996_4974
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for being filed late to the survey office regarding border control procedures.
insurance_2009_5239-2008
Insurance court dismissed late appeal due to lack of hearing on delay reasons, remanding for new review.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asianosainen oli kutsuttu lohkomistoimitukseen postin kuljetettavaksi vähintään 10 päivää ennen toimituskokousta annetulla kutsukirjeellä. Asianosainen ei ollut läsnä toimituksessa. Toimitus sai lainvoiman. Asianosainen ilmoitti tekemässään kantelussa, ettei hän ollut saanut kutsukirjettä.

Kysymys siitä, oliko edellytyksiä tehdystä kantelusta poistaa lohkominen.

KiinteistönmuodostamisL 168 § 1 mom

KiinteistönmuodostamisL 169 § 2 mom

KiinteistönmuodostamisL 170 § 1 mom