Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 4/2005 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal against refusal to file complaint when time limit expired.

Case Number KKO 4/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the decision refusing permission to file a complaint. The applicant sought to challenge a refusal to file a complaint after the statutory time limit for filing an appeal had already expired. The court held that the authority's decision to refuse filing was legally sound because the procedural deadline had passed, rendering the subsequent complaint inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Oikeudenkäymiskaari 25 luvun 9 §:n 3 momentti; The court ruled that a decision refusing permission to file a complaint is valid if the statutory time limit for filing an appeal has already expired, thereby precluding the filing of the complaint.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal time limit expiry filing permission procedural deadline inadmissible complaint supreme court review complaint refusal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Oikeudenkäymiskaari 25 luvun 9 §:n 3 momentti
AI generated
kko-other_2022_44
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for late objection to conviction due to missing information claim.
kko-precedent_1989_33
Supreme Court dismisses late extension request for termination dispute because application was filed after the two-week deadline expired.
kko-other_1999_2183
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding interpretation of objection notice when lower court procedure was erroneous.
kko-precedent_1998_50
Supreme Court restores time limit for debt arrangement objection when client's lawyer missed notification due to client's illness.
kko-other_2016_2352
Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages from illegal competition restrictions due to statute of limitations expiry.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys asianosaisen oikeudesta kannella tyytymättömyyden ilmoituksen hylkäämistä koskevasta päätöksestä oikeudenkäymiskaaren 25 luvun 9 §:n 3 momentin mukaan, kun päätös on annettu vasta sen jälkeen, kun lainkohdassa säädetty määräaika kantelua varten on kulunut umpeen, ja tyytymättömyyden ilmoituksen hyväksymisestä.