KKO 3139/2005
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal on legal aid costs where applicant failed to prove necessity of legal representation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's appeal regarding the state's liability for legal aid costs. The applicant argued that legal representation was essential for their defense, but the lower court found no evidence of necessity. Consequently, the court ruled that the state is not liable for costs when the need for a lawyer is not substantiated.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedLain 1087/1991 10 luku 1 §; Lain 1087/1991 10 luku 2 §: The state is not liable for legal aid costs if the applicant cannot demonstrate the necessity of legal representation.
Keywords
AI generated
legal aid costs
necessity of representation
state liability
legal aid entitlement
supreme court appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedLain 1087/1991 10 luku 1 §
Lain 1087/1991 10 luku 2 §
Full text
Kysymys oikeudenkäyntikulujen korvausvelvollisuudesta.