KKO 291/2005
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding threat during screening procedure as inadmissible due to lack of procedural prerequisites.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal concerning a threat made during the screening procedure. The applicant alleged intimidation by authorities during the hearing, but the court found the complaint procedurally inadmissible. The decision rests on the strict interpretation of the conditions required to initiate proceedings for threats in screening cases.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedOK 26 luku 2 §; The Supreme Court holds that complaints regarding threats during the screening procedure are inadmissible unless specific procedural prerequisites for initiating such proceedings are met.
Keywords
AI generated
screening procedure
threats during hearing
procedural prerequisites
inadmissible appeal
OK 26 luku 2
Cited Legislation
AI generatedOK 26 luku 2 §
Related Decisions
AI generatedkko-other_2005_2638
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding threat during screening procedure as inadmissible due to lack of procedural standing.
appeal_1980_rovaniemi__529
Witness summons by prosecutor does not bar later testimony if no prosecution charge exists.
kko-precedent_2003_137
Supreme Court denies lawyer's refusal to testify about client discussions regarding threats made to another client.
kko-precedent_1988_14
Witness forced to pay civil litigation costs for delay caused by false statement in civil case.
kko-other_2006_732
Supreme Court held that lower courts must organize a main hearing in robbery cases to ensure procedural fairness.
Full text
Kysymys seulontamenettelyn edellytyksistä oikeudenkäytössä kuultavan uhkaamista ynnä muuta koskevassa asiassa.
OK 26 luku 2 §