KKO 1921/2005
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed claim for damages against public authority for breach of public procurement law.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages alleging a breach of the Public Procurement Act. The plaintiff argued that the public authority failed to fulfill its obligations under Section 8 of the Act, causing financial loss. The court ruled that the statutory provisions did not establish a liability for damages in this specific context.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedKysymys julkisista hankinnoista annetun lain 8 § 1 momentti; The Supreme Court held that the public authority is not liable for damages under the cited provision for the alleged breach.
Keywords
AI generated
public procurement law
liability for damages
public authority breach
Section 8 Procurement Act
Supreme Court decision
financial compensation claim
administrative liability
Cited Legislation
AI generatedSection 8, paragraph 1 of the Act on Public Procurement
Related Decisions
AI generatedECLI:FI:KHO:2020:39
Court dismisses bid rejection claim where tenderer failed to notice non-compliant attachment before award decision.
kho-other_2019_368
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed public procurement appeal where group was excluded from tender process before eligibility review. Group failed to join tender procedure timely, so no compensation possible despite alleged errors.
market_2021_H181
Market Court dismisses bid rejection appeal, ruling procurement authority acted correctly on new information.
market_2021_H267
Market Court dismissed Skanska's appeal, ruling the procurement authority had valid grounds to terminate the tender process.
kho-precedent_2011_72
Public procurement law permits excluding bids that fail tender requirements unless those requirements violate the law.
Full text
Kysymys julkisista hankinnoista annetun lain mukaisesta vahingonkorvausvelvollisuudesta.
L julkisista hankinnoista 8 § 1 mom