Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 1515/2005 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal where claim was directed at wrong defendant and could not be dismissed for that reason.

Case Number KKO 1515/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a decision to dismiss the main claim for lack of standing. The appellant argued the claim should have been dismissed because it targeted the wrong defendant, but the court found no legal basis for such dismissal. Consequently, the lower court's decision to reject the claim was upheld as the procedural defect did not justify dismissal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki 1093/1972 oikeusvaltuutetun lainkäyttövelvollisuudesta 1 §; Laki 621/1999 oikeusvaltuutetun lainkäyttövelvollisuuden purkamisesta 1 §: The court cannot dismiss a claim solely because it is directed at the wrong defendant if the claimant lacks standing or if the procedural defect does not meet statutory requirements for dismissal.

Keywords

AI generated
wrong defendant dismissal of claim standing requirements procedural defect Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki 1093/1972 oikeusvaltuutetun lainkäyttövelvollisuudesta 1 §
Laki 621/1999 oikeusvaltuutetun lainkäyttövelvollisuuden purkamisesta 1 §
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys siitä, voitiinko kanne jättää tutkimatta sillä perusteella, että kanne oli kohdistettu väärään vastaajaan.