Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 786/2004 AI generated

Supreme Court distinguishes between fraud and aggravated fraud based on the scale of financial loss caused.

Case Number KKO 786/2004
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for aggravated fraud against a defendant who defrauded the unemployment fund of 91,650 marks over a year. The prosecution argued the substantial financial loss met the threshold for aggravated fraud, while the defense contended the amount constituted simple fraud. The court ruled that the significant monetary damage justified the heavier charge under the relevant criminal code provisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

RL 36 luku 1 §; RL 36 luku 2 § 1 mom: The distinction between fraud and aggravated fraud depends on whether the financial loss reaches the statutory threshold for the aggravated offense.

Keywords

AI generated
fraud classification aggravated fraud threshold unemployment fund fraud financial loss scale criminal liability standard

Cited Legislation

AI generated
RL 36 luku 1 §
RL 36 luku 2 § 1 mom
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys siitä, oliko vastaaja erehdyttämällä työttömyyskassan maksamaan hänelle perusteettomasti työttömyyspäivärahaa vuoden ajalta yhteensä 91 650 markkaa syyllistynyt petokseen vai törkeään petokseen.

RL 36 luku 1 §

RL 36 luku 2 § 1 mom