Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 514/2004 AI generated

Supreme Court held that damage from road construction compensation under Building Act is not a requisition case.

Case Number KKO 514/2004
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim that compensation for building damage caused by road construction constituted a requisition under the Requisition Act. The plaintiff argued the compensation was effectively a requisition, but the court distinguished between voluntary compensation under the Building Act and compulsory requisition. The decision clarified that statutory compensation for construction damage does not trigger the legal procedures of the Requisition Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Building Act s. 76; Requisition Act s. 1: Compensation for damage caused by public construction under the Building Act is not considered a requisition and does not require the procedures of the Requisition Act.

Keywords

AI generated
Building Act compensation road construction damage requisition law distinction statutory compensation public works liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Building Act s. 76
Requisition Act s. 1
AI generated
kho-other_2017_4580
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeals against a zoning plan amendment permitting a large retail store on a central area.
kko-precedent_2001_61
City liable for road vibration damage; minor wall cracks exempt from tolerance duty under environmental damage act.
kho-other_2017_4109
Appeal dismissed; late response ignored, and planning authority members not biased by store interests.
kko-precedent_1987_121
Supreme Court dismisses compensation claim for loss of underground space value and extracted stone rights under expropriation law.
kho-other_2018_5116
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal regarding staff transfer to company but dismisses claim on title change.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys siitä, oliko kadun rakentamisesta aiheutuneesta rakennuksen vaurioitumisesta rakennuslain 76 §:n nojalla tehty korvausvaatimus käsiteltävä lunastuslain mukaan.