Tenant's unilateral phone termination of lease held invalid; landlord remains liable for rent after tenant's move-out.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Finland allowed the tenant's claim that the landlord was liable for rent incurred after the tenant's move-out. The tenant argued he had terminated the lease via phone, but the court found no evidence of the landlord's consent or knowledge of this termination. Consequently, the court ruled that the lease remained valid until formally ended, making the landlord responsible for the outstanding rent.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedS. 100 of the Lease Act 1993; s. 100 of the Lease Act 1993: A unilateral termination of a lease by one party without the other party's consent or knowledge does not terminate the lease, and the party remaining in possession remains liable for rent.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Puolisot A ja B olivat yhdessä vuokranneet toistaiseksi voimassaolevalla vuokrasopimuksella asuinhuoneiston. A väitti, että hän oli puhelimitse irtisanonut vuokrasopimuksen omalta osaltaan. Kysymys A:n vastuusta vuokrista, jotka olivat syntyneet hänen poismuuttonsa jälkeen.