Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 2817/2004 AI generated

Tenant's unilateral phone termination of lease held invalid; landlord remains liable for rent after tenant's move-out.

Case Number KKO 2817/2004
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the tenant's claim that the landlord was liable for rent incurred after the tenant's move-out. The tenant argued he had terminated the lease via phone, but the court found no evidence of the landlord's consent or knowledge of this termination. Consequently, the court ruled that the lease remained valid until formally ended, making the landlord responsible for the outstanding rent.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

S. 100 of the Lease Act 1993; s. 100 of the Lease Act 1993: A unilateral termination of a lease by one party without the other party's consent or knowledge does not terminate the lease, and the party remaining in possession remains liable for rent.

Keywords

AI generated
unilateral lease termination tenant liability for rent landlord consent requirement phone notification validity lease duration continuity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 100 of the Lease Act 1993
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Puolisot A ja B olivat yhdessä vuokranneet toistaiseksi voimassaolevalla vuokrasopimuksella asuinhuoneiston. A väitti, että hän oli puhelimitse irtisanonut vuokrasopimuksen omalta osaltaan. Kysymys A:n vastuusta vuokrista, jotka olivat syntyneet hänen poismuuttonsa jälkeen.