KKO 2556/2004
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of prosecution's evidence due to lack of procedural grounds.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the prosecution's appeal against the lower courts' decision to exclude evidence. The prosecution argued that the evidence was inadmissible due to procedural violations, but the lower courts found no such grounds. The court upheld the lower courts' ruling because the prosecution failed to demonstrate a legal basis for excluding the evidence.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedKorkein oikeus 10.11.2004 KKO 2556/2004: Syyttäjää vastaan esitetyn esteellisyysväitteen käsittely käräjä- ja hovioikeudessa; esteellisyysväiteen puuttuminen tai väärin esittäminen johtaa väitteen hylkäämiseen.
Keywords
AI generated
procedural exclusion
inadmissibility appeal
evidence admissibility
prosecution appeal
lower court ruling
Related Decisions
AI generatedappeal_1984_helsinki__131
Court of Appeal reversed lower court, ordering legal aid for assault case not deemed minor under statute.
kko-precedent_2000_51
Supreme Court dismisses prosecutor's disqualification claim for lack of objective grounds beyond mere allegations.
kko-other_2019_115
Supreme Court held lower court must notify principal hearing when defendant requests hearing on fraud-related sentencing factors.
kko-precedent_1996_129
Supreme Court rejects appeal to change trial court reasoning on arson charges due to lack of legal necessity.
kko-other_2008_2235
Supreme Court held lower court must submit case to main hearing in murder proceedings.
Full text
Kysymys syyttäjää vastaan esitetyn esteellisyysväitteen käsittelystä käräjäoikeudessa ja hovioikeudessa.