Supreme Court dismisses claim for witness costs when witness hearing is deemed unnecessary for case resolution.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the respondent's claim for reimbursement of witness costs incurred by the prosecution and victim. The court found the witness hearing unnecessary for resolving the case, as the evidence was already established or irrelevant to the core issues. Consequently, the state was not obligated to cover these expenses under the relevant statute.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedL valtion varoista maksettavista todistelukustannuksista 9 §; Costs for witnesses are not payable from state funds when the court deems the witness hearing unnecessary for the resolution of the case.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kysymys vastaajan velvoittamisesta maksamaan syyttäjän ja asianomistajan nimeämälle todistajalle korvausta, kun todistajan kuuleminen katsottiin asian ratkaisemisen kannalta ilmeisen tarpeettomaksi.
L valtion varoista maksettavista todistelukustannuksista 9 §