KKO 1938/2004
AI generated
Supreme Court rules a lake within a property boundary is an enclosed lake and thus part of the real estate.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court ruled that a lake situated within the defined boundaries of a property constitutes an enclosed lake and is legally part of that real estate. The parties disputed whether the water body should be excluded from the property description based on its natural state. The court determined that the physical location within the boundary lines overrides any argument regarding the lake's natural characteristics.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedKorkein oikeus 1938/2004: Kiinteistön rajauksen mukaisesti kiinteistön alueella oleva lampi on umpilampi ja kuuluu kiinteistön osaksi; kiinteistön rajauksen mukainen sijainti määrittää vesialueen osuuden kiinteistöön.
Keywords
AI generated
enclosed lake
property boundary
real estate inclusion
natural water body
land registration
Related Decisions
AI generatedECLI:FI:KHO:2023:108
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal, quashing permit due to insufficient survey and flawed interest comparison in floating bridge case.
admin_1989_water-superior__74
Administrative court dismissed owner's claim for official aid to replace a dam blocking navigation.
admin_1988_central-finland-county__744
Administrative court dismissed state's claim to own road area as separate property due to lack of ownership.
admin_1993_water-superior__79
Administrative court dismissed permit request for boat dock due to lack of property rights and disproportionate public harm.
kko-precedent_2017_53
Supreme Court dismisses tidal marsh acquisition claim due to minor harm compared to natural landscape preservation goals.
Full text
Kysymys siitä, kuuluiko erään kiinteistön alueella oleva lampi kiinteistölle umpilampena.