KKO 630/2003
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses lawyer's claim for co-responsibility for opposing party's court costs with client.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the lawyer's claim to be jointly liable for the opposing party's court costs incurred in the lower court. The lawyer argued that under the relevant statute, he shared the duty to pay these costs alongside his client. The court ruled that the statutory provision imposes the obligation solely on the client, not on the lawyer acting as their representative.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedOK 21 luku 6 §; The lawyer acting for a client is not jointly liable with the client for the opposing party's court costs in the lower court proceedings.
Keywords
AI generated
lawyer liability
court costs
client responsibility
legal representative
Supreme Court
civil procedure
cost allocation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedOK 21 luku 6 §
Related Decisions
AI generatedkko-other_2022_365
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding legal costs for granting further stay of execution permission.
kko-precedent_2011_55
Supreme Court allows appeal to complete criminal trial judgment regarding unaddressed civil costs claim.
kko-other_2009_1446
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding court costs calculation method and the effect of granting a cost claim.
kko-other_2021_1293
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding court costs and lawyer fees for a civil procedure case.
kko-other_2003_555
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lower court relies on facts not raised in the permitted settlement case.
Full text
Kysymys velkomusasian kantajan asiamiehenä toimineen asianajajan velvollisuudesta osallistua yhdessä päämiehensä kanssa tämän vastapuolen oikeudenkäyntikulujen korvaamiseen hovioikeudessa.
OK 21 luku 6 §