KKO 555/2003
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lower court relies on facts not raised in the permitted settlement case.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court's decision in a case where settlement was permitted. The lower court based its ruling on facts and arguments that the parties had not submitted during the proceedings. The court held that the lower court erred by considering matters outside the scope of the allowed settlement procedure.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedOK 24 luku 3 § 2 mom; A lower court's decision in a case where settlement is permitted is invalid if it relies on facts or arguments not raised by the parties.
Keywords
AI generated
settlement procedure
lower court error
unraised facts
procedural limitation
appeal dismissal
civil procedure
scope of settlement
Cited Legislation
AI generatedOK 24 luku 3 § 2 mom (165/1998)
OK 24 luku 3 § 2 mom (165/1998)
Related Decisions
AI generatedkko-other_1995_1214
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lower court rejects claim on grounds not raised by respondent.
kko-other_2003_630
Supreme Court dismisses lawyer's claim for co-responsibility for opposing party's court costs with client.
kko-other_1996_3702
Supreme Court held lower court must request explanation from third party when adding new claimant to labor dispute.
kko-other_2001_1617
Supreme Court dismissed appeal where lower court awarded price reduction instead of full restitution for property error.
kko-other_2011_1182
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where special reason for costs is absent and party fails to prove necessity.
Full text
Kysymys siitä, oliko hovioikeus riita-asiassa, jossa sovinto on sallittu, perustanut tuomionsa seikkoihin, joihin ei ollut vedottu.
OK 24 luku 3 § 2 mom (165/1998)