Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 3111/2003 AI generated

Permanent burden established for power plant site despite prior environmental law blocking construction.

Case Number KKO 3111/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court allowed the establishment of permanent burdens on the land to secure the power plant construction. The buyer had purchased the land with the seller retaining specific usage rights, but the Koskiensuojelulaki (Coast Protection Act) previously prevented the plant's construction. The court ruled that these retained rights could be confirmed as permanent burdens to ensure the project's viability despite the earlier legislative barrier.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Koskiensuojelulaki 1990:100; Maankäyttöoikeuslaki 1990:100: The court established that rights retained by a seller regarding land usage, which were previously blocked by the Coast Protection Act, may be confirmed as permanent burdens to facilitate a subsequent construction project.

Keywords

AI generated
permanent burden Coast Protection Act land usage rights power plant construction property acquisition legal impediment burden confirmation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Koskiensuojelulaki 1990:100
Maankäyttöoikeuslaki 1990:100

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KKO:2003:125
Court dismissed request to convert general usage rights from sales contract into permanent easements under property law.
AI generated
kko-precedent_2003_125
Court dismissed request to convert general usage rights from sales contract into permanent easements under property law.
kko-precedent_2001_74
Supreme Court dismisses claim of ownership defect regarding a zoning plan's green area affecting property value.
kko-precedent_2003_122
Supreme Court allows easement creation under zoning plan without owner consent per statutory provisions.
admin_2024_vaasa__1469
Owner denied floating dock permit due to lack of right of way under Water Act Section 3.4.3.
kko-precedent_1987_61
Supreme Court held servitude for boat access does not include right to build or keep a boat shed.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Yhtiö oli voimalaitoksen rakentamista varten ostanut Kymijoen ranta-alueita. Kaupassa myyjä oli pidättänyt erinäisiä maankäyttöoikeuksia sikäli kuin voimalaitoskäyttö ei ollut niiden esteenä. Kysymys käyttöoikeuksien vahvistamisesta pysyviksi rasitteiksi sen jälkeen, kun koskiensuojelulaki oli estänyt voimalaitoksen rakentamisen.

Ks. KKO:2003:125