KKO 3083/2003
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed claim for interest on compensation when applicant had prior permission to take possession of the land.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's claim for additional compensation interest regarding the purchase of land. The applicant argued that interest should accrue from the date of the purchase permit, but the court found that the applicant already held the land with prior permission. Consequently, the court ruled that no additional interest was due because the applicant's possession was not unlawful or delayed by the state.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedLunastuslaki 95 § 1 kohta; Kun hakija on saanut luvan lunastettavan alueen ennakkohaltuunottoon, ei makseta lisäkorvauksena korotusta.
Keywords
AI generated
purchase permit
prior possession
interest claim
land acquisition
Supreme Court
compensation interest
unlawful possession
Cited Legislation
AI generatedLunastuslaki 95 § 1 kohta
Related Decisions
AI generatedkko-precedent_1993_28
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for interest on compensation because the appeal omitted the interest claim.
admin_1992_water-superior__35
Administrative court orders 16% delay interest on damages claim for unauthorized water diversion.
kko-precedent_1992_90
Supreme Court allows additional compensation for wrongful detention where state previously denied damages for suffering.
kko-precedent_1992_127
Supreme Court allows expropriation compensation based on yield value when lower interest rates lack legal basis.
kko-precedent_1994_15
Supreme Court allows full compensation based on 1989 market prices for land taken for a road.
Full text
Kysymys maaoikeuden tuomitsemalle lisäkorvaukselle maksettavasta korosta, kun hakija oli saanut luvan lunastettavan alueen ennakkohaltuunottoon.
LunastusL 95 § 1 mom