KKO 2193/2003
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding oral hearing requirement in insurance court accident compensation case.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Insurance Court's decision to proceed without an oral hearing. The appellant argued that a hearing was mandatory under the Insurance Act for accident compensation disputes, while the court found no such statutory requirement for this specific type of case. Consequently, the court upheld the lower court's procedural decision as legally sound.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedInsurance Act 1906; Insurance Court Act 1906: The Insurance Court is not required to hold an oral hearing in accident compensation cases unless specifically mandated by law.
Keywords
AI generated
insurance court procedure
oral hearing requirement
accident compensation
Supreme Court review
procedural law
Cited Legislation
AI generatedInsurance Act 1906
Insurance Court Act 1906
Related Decisions
AI generatedkko-other_2002_2755
Supreme Court allows late accident compensation claim when insurer failed to notify policyholder of coverage termination.
kko-other_1998_3859
Supreme Court dismissed appeal allowing insurance claim resubmission after new accident investigation findings.
insurance_1996_6485-1995
Insurance court ruled that occupational disease onset date was December 1, 1993, not January 12, 1994, to ensure fair compensation.
kko-other_2007_1911
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding insurance law procedure where insurer failed to comment on new claim.
insurance_2017_1389-2016
Appeal dismissed for late filing due to lack of force majeure despite correct deadline calculation.
Full text
Kysymys suullisen käsittelyn toimittamisesta vakuutusoikeudessa tapaturmavakuutuskorvausta koskevassa asiassa.