Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 943/2002 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed claim for ownership of seized car based on lack of proof of ownership rights.

Case Number KKO 943/2002
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim to ownership of a car seized by authorities. The plaintiff argued they owned the vehicle, but failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish this right against the seizure. Consequently, the court ruled that without proof of ownership, the claim could not be upheld.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki 1093/1991 (1093/1991); Laki 1093/1991 (1093/1991): A claim for ownership of seized property is dismissed if the claimant fails to prove the requisite ownership rights.

Keywords

AI generated
ownership rights seized property civil procedure burden of proof vehicle ownership court dismissal property claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
1093/1991

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys omistusoikeudesta ulosmitattuun autoon.