Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 623/2002 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses claim for replacement of torn protective film after accident due to lack of direct causation.

Case Number KKO 623/2002
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the claimant's request for compensation regarding the replacement of a torn protective film following an accident. The court found that the damage to the film was not a direct consequence of the accident but rather resulted from the claimant's own negligence in handling the equipment. Consequently, the court ruled that no liability existed for the specific damage claimed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Tutkintalain 10 luku; Vahingonkorvauslain 1 luku: The court held that damages for a torn protective film were not compensable as they lacked a direct causal link to the accident and were attributable to the claimant's own fault.

Keywords

AI generated
protective film damage torn film compensation lack of causation claimant negligence accident liability Supreme Court ruling direct consequence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Chapter 10 of the Investigation Act
Section 1 of the Damages Act

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys kiertäjäkalvosimen repeämän korvaamisesta tapaturman seurauksena.