Supreme Court dismissed claim for state reimbursement of witness examination costs due to lack of legal basis.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the applicant's claim for reimbursement of costs incurred during witness examinations against the state. The applicant argued that these expenses should be covered under general administrative principles, while the state contended no specific statutory provision mandated such reimbursement. The court ruled that without an explicit legal basis in the relevant statutes, the state is not obligated to bear these specific litigation costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedKorkein oikeus 1. luvun 100 § ja 1. luvun 101 §:n nojalla: Valtion velvollisuus korvata syyttäjän tai syytetyn todistuskustannuksia ei ole lain erikseen sääntelyssä, vaan ne kuuluvat yleisesti syyttäjän tai syytetyn omaan vastuunsa.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Kysymys todistelukustannusten korvaamisesta valtiolle.