Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding driving under influence after taking medication post-start of journey.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. The defendant argued that the drug Diapam only began to affect them after they started driving, yet the court found the evidence of impairment sufficient. Consequently, the court ruled that the timing of the drug's onset did not negate the finding of guilt at the time of driving.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedLaki rattijuopumuksesta (1093/1999); 1093/1999, 1 §: Driving under the influence is established if impairment exists at the time of driving, regardless of whether the substance was taken before or after the journey commenced.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Otettuaan 7 - 8 tablettia Diapam-nimistä huumaavaa lääkettä vastaaja oli ajanut henkilöautolla lyhyen matkan. Vastaaja kiisti syytteen rattijuopumuksesta, koska lääkkeet olivat alkaneet vaikuttaa vasta ajon jälkeen. Kysymys näytön arvioinnista.