Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 1566/2002 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed creditor's claim for payment order cessation as it lacked unreasonably delayed grounds.

Case Number KKO 1566/2002
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the creditor's request to cease the debtor's payment order under the Debt Restructuring Act. The creditor argued for cessation without providing specific reasons for the alleged unreasonable delay. The court ruled that the request was inadmissible because the creditor failed to substantiate the claim of delay.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

61 § 1 momentin velkajärjestelystä annetun lain mukaan maksuohjelman määräämiseksi raukeamaan hakemuksen esittäminen ilman aiheetonta viivytystä; velkojan on osoitettava viivästyksen olemassaolo ja se on perusteltamaton.

Keywords

AI generated
Debt Restructuring Act payment order cessation unreasonable delay creditor's claim Supreme Court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
61 § 1 momentin velkajärjestelystä annetun lain
AI generated
kko-leave_2026_15
Supreme Court rules debt restructuring payment plan termination request was timely filed without unjustified delay.
kko-other_1995_2335
Supreme Court clarifies that a debt repayment plan's start date is the date of the court's decision, not the agreement date.
kko-other_2007_97
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding debt restructuring payment scheme changes without unjustified delay after notice.
kko-other_1998_3526
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding termination of payment plan under Finnish Debt Restructuring Act Section 42.
kko-other_1995_4689
Supreme Court held that a confirmed payment plan duration cannot interrupt unemployment insurance assessment when the debtor's payment obligation was removed due to lack of funds.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys siitä, oliko velkoja tehnyt hakemuksensa maksuohjelman määräämiseksi raukeamaan yksityishenkilön velkajärjestelystä annetun lain 61 §:n 1 momentissa säädetyin tavoin ilman aiheetonta viivytystä.