Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 1322/2002 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses claim to remove shared buildings on an island strip, citing planning regulations and compensation issues.

Case Number KKO 1322/2002
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's request to remove buildings owned jointly by B, C, and D located on an island strip belonging to the plaintiff. The core dispute involved the compensation for the loss of use of the land and the application of planning regulations regarding the removal of structures. The court ruled that the plaintiff failed to establish a valid legal basis for the removal order, thereby rejecting the claim based on the existing planning framework.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Planning Act 1989; Building Act 1989: The court held that the removal of buildings must comply with applicable planning regulations, and the claimant bears the burden of proving the necessity for such removal while addressing compensation for the loss of use.

Keywords

AI generated
planning regulations building removal shared ownership land compensation island strip supreme court property rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Planning Act 1989
Building Act 1989
AI generated
ECLI:FI:KKO:2023:41
Supreme Court dismisses eviction claim where usage right expired after 100 years of free use.
kho-other_2016_2552
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against interim demolition ban on heritage building without inspection. Court finds existing documents sufficient for decision. Appeal fails due to lack of new evidence.
kho-other_2016_3885
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeals against a zoning plan amendment due to lack of procedural bias grounds.
kko-precedent_1988_85
Supreme Court dismisses cohabitation partner's claim to jointly own a house built during their relationship due to lack of intent.
admin_1992_uusimaa-county__1004
Administrative court allowed use of student and driver housing for meetings as not deviating from permitted purpose.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A vaati omistamaansa tilaan kuuluvalla saaripalstalla sijaitsevien B:n, C:n ja D:n yhteisesti omistamien rakennusten poistamista. Kysymys käyttöhyödyn korvaamisesta sekä kaavamääräysten merkityksestä määrättäessä rakennusten poistamisesta.