Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 90/2001 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal where insurance company stamp delayed filing but actual submission was timely.

Case Number KKO 90/2001
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the timeliness of a complaint submitted to the Accident Board. Although the complaint document bore a stamp from an insurance company indicating receipt after the deadline, the court found the actual submission to the board occurred within the statutory period. The court ruled that the physical location of the stamp did not alter the factual reality of when the document was delivered to the competent authority.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Accident Board Act 1993, s. 10; Supreme Court Act 1993, s. 10: A complaint is considered filed on time if it reaches the competent authority within the deadline, regardless of subsequent markings or delays by third parties.

Keywords

AI generated
accident board appeal filing deadline third party stamp timely submission procedural defect complaint admissibility supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Accident Board Act 1993, s. 10
Supreme Court Act 1993, s. 10
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys siitä, oliko valitus saapunut ajoissa vaikka valituskirjelmä tapaturmalautakunnan päätökseen oli leimattu vakuutusyhtiössä saapuneeksi määräajan jälkeen.