Supreme Court dismissed appeal where insurance company stamp delayed filing but actual submission was timely.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the timeliness of a complaint submitted to the Accident Board. Although the complaint document bore a stamp from an insurance company indicating receipt after the deadline, the court found the actual submission to the board occurred within the statutory period. The court ruled that the physical location of the stamp did not alter the factual reality of when the document was delivered to the competent authority.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedAccident Board Act 1993, s. 10; Supreme Court Act 1993, s. 10: A complaint is considered filed on time if it reaches the competent authority within the deadline, regardless of subsequent markings or delays by third parties.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kysymys siitä, oliko valitus saapunut ajoissa vaikka valituskirjelmä tapaturmalautakunnan päätökseen oli leimattu vakuutusyhtiössä saapuneeksi määräajan jälkeen.