Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 764/2001 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses public official's claim that a newspaper article constituted a punishable insult.

Case Number KKO 764/2001
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the complaint filed by a city councilor against the mayor for alleged insult in a newspaper article. The councilor argued the mayor had distorted facts, while the defense contended the article remained within the bounds of legitimate public criticism. The court ruled that the statements were protected opinions on public affairs and did not meet the legal threshold for an insult.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki 1093/1976, 10 luku, 1 §; Laki 1093/1976, 10 luku, 2 §: A statement made in the public interest regarding a public official's conduct is not an insult if it is based on reasonable grounds and does not exceed the limits of legitimate criticism.

Keywords

AI generated
public official newspaper article insult charge public interest legitimate criticism Supreme Court defamation law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki 1093/1976, 10 luku, 1 §
Laki 1093/1976, 10 luku, 2 §
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kaupunginvaltuutettu oli lehtikirjoituksessa arvostellut kaupunginjohtajan viranhoitoa väittäen muun muassa tämän vääristelleen tosiasioita. Kysymys siitä, täyttikö kyseinen johtavan virkamiehen julkinen arvostelu solvauksen tunnusmerkistön.