Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 514/2001 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed creditor's claim for guarantee renewal due to failure to file within 24 days of bankruptcy petition.

Case Number KKO 514/2001
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the creditor's claim for the renewal of the security against the guarantors. The creditor filed a counterclaim against the debtor after receiving the bankruptcy petition, but failed to file the subsequent guarantee claim within the strict 24-day period mandated by law. The court ruled that the statutory time limit for initiating the guarantee claim was not met, rendering the claim inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

24 § 1 momentin mukaan konkurssipesä ajoi velan maksun peräyttämistä koskevaa takaisinsaantikannetta velkojaa vastaan, joka sen varalta, että kanne hyväksyttäisiin, nosti velan takaajia vastaan kanteen takauksen uudelleen asettamisesta tai sen arvon korvaamisesta; velkojan on nostettava takausuudistuskanne konkurssipesään annetun lain 24 §:n 1 momentin mukaisessa määräajassa.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy petition guarantee renewal statutory time limit creditor's claim inadmissible claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
24 § 1 momentin mukaan konkurssipesä ajoi velan maksun peräyttämistä koskevaa takaisinsaantikannetta velkojaa vastaan, joka sen varalta, että kanne hyväksyttäisiin, nosti velan takaajia vastaan kanteen takauksen uudelleen asettamisesta tai sen arvon korvaamisesta
AI generated
kko-other_1998_1957
Supreme Court held creditor's right against guarantor extinguished if creditor failed to monitor principal debtor's bankruptcy proceedings.
kko-precedent_2000_110
Supreme Court allows recovery claim against guarantor after debtor's repayment to bankruptcy estate via recovery action.
kko-precedent_1987_76
Supreme Court dismisses guarantee claim because primary debt extinguished by payment, preventing guarantor's right of recourse.
kko-precedent_1992_114
Guarantor remains liable for debt portion not repaid to pledgee after partial recovery from mortgagor.
kko-precedent_1994_128
Supreme Court dismisses guarantee claim as premature when bankruptcy is suspended due to lack of assets.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Konkurssipesä ajoi velan maksun peräyttämistä koskevaa takaisinsaantikannetta velkojaa vastaan, joka sen varalta, että kanne hyväksyttäisiin, nosti velan takaajia vastaan kanteen takauksen uudelleen asettamisesta tai sen arvon korvaamisesta. Kysymys siitä, oliko velkojan kanne nostettava takaisinsaannista konkurssipesään annetun lain 24 §:n 1 momentin mukaisessa määräajassa.