Supreme Court allows coastal municipality to separate shared-use areas from its territory despite individual usage rights.

The Supreme Court ruled that a coastal municipality could legally separate specific shared-use areas from its territory, even though an individual held exclusive usage rights granted in 1989. The plaintiff argued that such separation would violate their established rights, while the municipality contended that administrative reorganization was necessary for effective management. The court determined that the original grant did not prevent the municipality from restructuring its boundaries to exclude the disputed areas.