Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 2508/2001 AI generated

Supreme Court clarifies that attempted murder is a distinct crime from theft, not merely a means to commit theft.

Case Number KKO 2508/2001
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Finland clarified the legal distinction between attempted murder and theft in a case involving a defendant accused of both. The prosecution argued that the defendant's actions constituted theft, while the defense contended that the intent to kill was the primary motive. The court ruled that the specific intent to unlawfully deprive another of property must be proven separately from the intent to kill, establishing that attempted murder remains a distinct offense even if theft was the underlying goal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 6 of the Act on Punishment of Crimes; Section 10 of the Act on Punishment of Crimes: Attempted murder is a distinct crime from theft and does not merge into theft merely because the killing was intended to facilitate the theft.

Keywords

AI generated
attempted murder theft distinction criminal intent specific intent Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 6 of the Act on Punishment of Crimes
Section 10 of the Act on Punishment of Crimes

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys murhan ja tapon välisestä rajanvedosta.