Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 2/2001 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal to resume evidence after dismissing late claim due to delay in complaint.

Case Number KKO 2/2001
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of First Instance dismissed the claim for price reduction and damages without evidence, ruling it was filed too late due to a delayed complaint. The Supreme Court granted the application to resume evidence proceedings to address the delay in filing the complaint. Consequently, the case was remanded for further examination rather than being dismissed outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Käräjäoikeus lain 10. luvun 1 § ja 10. luvun 2 § nojalla hylkäävän tuomion; asianosainen voi pyytää todistelun vastaanottamista viivästyneen reklamaation perusteella.

Keywords

AI generated
late claim dismissal delayed complaint evidence resumption price reduction claim damage compensation Court of First Instance Supreme Court remand

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Käräjäoikeus lain 10. luvun 1 §
Käräjäoikeus lain 10. luvun 2 §
AI generated
kko-other_2002_3169
Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court's refusal to permit amendment of trial arguments.
kko-other_1999_2183
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding interpretation of objection notice when lower court procedure was erroneous.
kko-other_2005_347
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding search conditions for suspected assault under Criminal Procedure Code.
kko-precedent_2014_45
Supreme Court remands case for main hearing due to insufficient evidence assessment in lower court judgment.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2023:43
Supreme Court allows retrial for gross debtor dishonesty where reasonable living costs replace business salary as the benchmark for asset transfers.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Käräjäoikeus oli ilman todistelua välituomiolla hylännyt hinnanalennus- ja vahingonkorvauskanteen sillä perusteella, että kanne oli nostettu liian myöhään, ja reklamaation viivästymisen perusteella. Kysymys asian palauttamisesta todistelun vastaanottamiseksi reklamaation viivästymisestä sekä asian käsittelyn jatkamiseksi muilta osin.