Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 1833/2001 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses preclusion objection when both criminal and civil claims are before the court of appeal.

Case Number KKO 1833/2001
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the defendant's objection to the preclusion of the appeal court proceedings. The lower court had accepted both a criminal penalty claim and a civil damages claim against the same defendant. The court ruled that since both claims concern the same factual dispute, the defendant cannot demand separate proceedings by invoking preclusion.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki rikosasioista 379/1996; Laki vakuutussuostumuksista 1000/1996: When both criminal and civil claims arise from the same facts, a party cannot invoke preclusion to separate the proceedings before the court of appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
preclusion objection criminal and civil claims same factual dispute court of appeal procedural consolidation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki rikosasioista 379/1996
Laki vakuutussuostumuksista 1000/1996
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys prekluusiosta hovioikeudessa, kun hovioikeuden tutkittavaksi oli saatettu sekä rangaistus- että vahingonkorvausvaatimus.