KKO 1833/2001
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses preclusion objection when both criminal and civil claims are before the court of appeal.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the defendant's objection to the preclusion of the appeal court proceedings. The lower court had accepted both a criminal penalty claim and a civil damages claim against the same defendant. The court ruled that since both claims concern the same factual dispute, the defendant cannot demand separate proceedings by invoking preclusion.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedLaki rikosasioista 379/1996; Laki vakuutussuostumuksista 1000/1996: When both criminal and civil claims arise from the same facts, a party cannot invoke preclusion to separate the proceedings before the court of appeal.
Keywords
AI generated
preclusion objection
criminal and civil claims
same factual dispute
court of appeal
procedural consolidation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedLaki rikosasioista 379/1996
Laki vakuutussuostumuksista 1000/1996
Related Decisions
AI generatedkko-other_2002_2150
Supreme Court held lower court must provide compensation in main proceedings when damages are contested.
kko-other_2005_544
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding severe assault case where screening procedure requirements were not met.
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.
kko-other_2006_325
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding police screening requirements for assault cases under specific procedural rules.
kko-other_2008_65
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding High Court's duty to transfer serious theft cases to main court.
Full text
Kysymys prekluusiosta hovioikeudessa, kun hovioikeuden tutkittavaksi oli saatettu sekä rangaistus- että vahingonkorvausvaatimus.