Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 969/2000 AI generated

Starting a debt arrangement interrupts the limitation period for a commanditee's tax liability towards the general partner.

Case Number KKO 969/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that initiating a debt arrangement interrupts the limitation period for tax debts owed by a general partner of a limited partnership. The plaintiff argued that the debt arrangement halted the statute of limitations, while the tax authority contended otherwise. The court held that the procedural act of starting the arrangement legally interrupts the time limit for enforcement against the individual partner.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 10 of the Limitation of Actions Act; s. 10 of the Limitation of Actions Act: The commencement of a debt arrangement procedure interrupts the limitation period for claims against a general partner of a limited partnership.

Keywords

AI generated
debt arrangement procedure limitation period interruption commanditee liability tax debt enforcement limited partnership law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 10 of the Limitation of Actions Act
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys siitä, oliko velkajärjestelyn aloittaminen keskeyttänyt kommandiittiyhtiön verovelan vanhentumisen siitä yhtiömiesasemansa perusteella vastuussa olevaan yhtiömieheen nähden.