Spousal compensation claim for exclusive use of joint property after divorce dismissed due to lack of fault.

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the claim for compensation arising from the exclusive use of a jointly owned residence by one spouse after divorce. The plaintiff argued that the remaining spouse's sole occupancy constituted a breach of duty, while the defendant contended that such usage was a normal consequence of the divorce without fault. The court ruled that no legal obligation existed to compensate for the mere fact of exclusive possession absent specific fault or contractual breach.