Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 471/2000 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; boundary line follows 1926 survey, not 1925 deed description of the beach.

Case Number KKO 471/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding a boundary dispute between two properties. The court found that the 1926 subdivision survey, which defined the land boundary, took precedence over the 1925 deed description that extended the area to the beach. Consequently, the boundary was established along the line of the 1926 survey rather than following the deed's reference to the shoreline.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Kiinteistönmuodostamislaki 101 §; When a later subdivision survey conflicts with an earlier deed description of a boundary, the survey controls the legal boundary line.

Keywords

AI generated
boundary dispute subdivision survey deed description property line land survey priority

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Kiinteistönmuodostamislaki 101 §
AI generated
kko-precedent_1998_31
Supreme Court rules that land shares in a lake bed include both original water area shares and later acquired land shares.
kko-other_2003_964
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding lease term extension when land nature changed from crown to tax land.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2026:29
Supreme Court dismisses request to cancel land division records due to long-standing unchallenged ownership and lack of public interest in correction.
kko-precedent_1990_91
Supreme Court dismisses compensation claim where landowner accepted existing easement without payment upon purchase.
kko-precedent_1999_62
Supreme Court of Finland rules that conflicting land division records require annulment of a final judgment rather than correction via land determination.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Lohkomistoimituksessa vuonna 1926 rakennetut kaksi rajapyykkiä sijaitsivat kiinteistömääritystoimituksen mukaan noin 9,5 metrin ja 16 metrin etäisyydellä rantaviivasta. Vuoden 1925 kauppakirjassa olevan maininnan mukaan määräala ulottui rantaan. Lohkomistoimituksessa tehdyt lohkomiskirja- ja kartta osoittivat, että määräalasta muodostettu tila ulottui silloiseen rantaviivaan. Asiassa ei ollut perusteita käydä tilan rajaa kiinteistönmääritystoimituksessa suoraksi linjaksi rannan tuntumassa olevien pyykkien välille.

KiinteistönmuodostamisL 101 §