KKO 2180/2000
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding seizure of vessel as no specific security was provided for the measure.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the seizure of a vessel, ruling that the measure lacked a valid legal basis. The appellant argued the seizure was unlawful, but the court found no evidence of specific security or guarantee to cover potential damages. Consequently, the court held that the seizure could not be justified without such security, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedSection 10 of the Maritime Code; Section 10 of the Maritime Code: A seizure of a vessel requires the provision of specific security or a guarantee to cover potential damages; without such security, the seizure is legally unfounded.
Keywords
AI generated
vessel seizure
maritime security
specific security
damages guarantee
Maritime Code
supreme court
procedural requirement
Cited Legislation
AI generatedSection 10 of the Maritime Code
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedkko-precedent_1993_166
Carrier loses deck cargo exemption due to gross negligence but limits liability by weight and tonnage.
labour_1985_128
Labor court dismissed strike action for blocking engine room as it did not target collective agreement terms.
kko-precedent_1997_77
Supreme Court allows court costs claim in settlement request when opposing party contests it.
kko-precedent_1994_125
Supreme Court dismisses lower courts' rejection of claim, allowing review of contract formation and damages.
labour_2015_22
Labour court dismissed union appeal against termination of employment contract due to company insolvency proceedings.
Full text
Kysymys turvaamistoimenpiteen määräämisen edellytyksistä aluksen saartoa koskevassa asiassa.
Ks. KKO:2000:94