Supreme Court dismissed claim for additional shoulder injuries not directly caused by the fall.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the employee's claim for compensation regarding additional shoulder injuries sustained alongside the main injury from a fall. The employee argued that other shoulder damages were consequential to the accident, while the opposing party contended they were unrelated. The court ruled that only injuries directly caused by the fall were compensable, excluding those deemed independent or secondary.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedTyömenetelmäsääntely 1983: 10 §; 11 §: An employee is entitled to compensation only for injuries directly caused by the work accident, excluding those that are independent or merely coincidental to the event.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Työntekijä oli pudonnut kuorman päältä maahan ja vahingoittunut muun muassa oikeaan olkapäähänsä. Kysymys siitä, oliko hän saanut tapaturman seurauksena korvattavaksi katsotun oikean olkapään kiertäjäkalvosimen repeämän lisäksi myös muita olkanivelen vammoja.