Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 1621/2000 AI generated

Supreme Court orders combined prison term when new crimes committed during probation lead to mandatory execution.

Case Number KKO 1621/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Finland ordered the execution of a combined prison term for a defendant who committed new crimes during the probation period of a suspended sentence. Lower courts had sentenced the defendant to a combined term but failed to execute the suspended portion separately from the new crimes. The court ruled that under the relevant statute, committing new offenses during probation mandates the immediate execution of the suspended sentence alongside the new term.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

L ehdollisesta rangaistuksesta annetun lain 4 § 2 mom; When a person on probation commits new crimes, the suspended sentence must be executed in combination with the sentence for the new crimes.

Keywords

AI generated
probation violation suspended sentence execution combined prison term new crimes during probation mandatory execution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
L ehdollisesta rangaistuksesta 4 § 2 mom
L ehdollisesta rangaistuksesta 4 § 2 mom
AI generated
kko-precedent_1996_40
Supreme Court partially allows probation execution and imposes joint sentence for new crimes committed during probation period.
kko-precedent_2002_37
Supreme Court partially executes probation for new crimes committed during probation period under old law.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2023:40
Supreme Court dismisses detention order where conditional sentence lacks finality for combined sentence calculation.
kko-precedent_1994_25
Supreme Court allows conditional sentence for repeat offender where new crimes occurred after probation ended.
kko-precedent_1996_6
Supreme Court allows community service for prior prison sentences where lower courts wrongly denied it.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ehdolliseen vankeusrangaistukseen tuomittu oli koetusaikana syyllistynyt uusiin rikoksiin, joiden johdosta alemmat oikeudet olivat tuominneet hänet yhteiseen ehdottomaan vankeusrangaistukseen sekä määränneet ehdollisen rangaistuksen pantavaksi erikseen täytäntöön tuomitsematta ehdolliseen rangaistukseen johtaneista ja uusista rikoksista yhteistä vankeusrangaistusta. Ehdollisesta rangaistuksesta annetun lain 4 §:n 2 momentin nojalla Korkein oikeus tuomitsi yhteisen vankeusrangaistuksen.

L ehdollisesta rangaistuksesta 4 § 2 mom