Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 107/2000 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses claim for accident compensation when injury occurs during mandatory work practice under the Employment Act.

Case Number KKO 107/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's claim for accident compensation regarding an injury sustained during mandatory work practice. The applicant argued that the injury should be covered under the Work Accident Compensation Act, while the opposing party contended that the specific provisions of the Employment Act excluded such coverage for this context. The court ruled that the statutory framework for work practice under the Employment Act precludes the application of the Work Accident Compensation Act in this scenario.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Tapaturmakorvauslaki 1 § 1 kohta; Työeläkelaki 1 § 1 kohta: Injuries sustained during mandatory work practice governed by the Employment Act are excluded from compensation under the Work Accident Compensation Act.

Keywords

AI generated
work practice injury employment act provisions accident compensation exclusion mandatory training coverage supreme court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Tapaturmakorvauslaki 1 § 1 kohta
Työeläkelaki 1 § 1 kohta
AI generated
kko-precedent_1989_52
Supreme Court dismisses claim that a knife cut during a lunch break in a social room was a work accident. The court rules the injury did not occur in work-related circumstances. The claim is rejected because the location and timing were not part of the work environment. The decision clarifies the strict boundaries of work accident coverage. This case establishes that breaks in designated social areas are not work-related. The ruling emphasizes the need for direct work connection for coverage. The court maintains the lower court's decision on the matter.
insurance_1978_6061-1977
Insurance court dismissed claim for work injury compensation when injury occurred during employer-organized sports training.
insurance_1977_6782-1976
Workplace injury during lunch break deemed work-related accident under Finnish Insurance Court jurisdiction.
kko-precedent_2000_93
Supreme Court holds injury during free time after event program ended is not a work accident under Act 4 § 1.
insurance_1998_3849-1997
Temporary work without payment does not constitute a TVL contract; meal allowance alone is insufficient compensation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A oli vammautunut työllisyysasetuksen mukaisessa työharjoittelussa. Kysymys hänen oikeudestaan tapaturmakorvaukseen.

TapVakL 1 § 1 mom