Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 3557/1999 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding application of Civil Procedure Code and unjust enrichment rules.

Case Number KKO 3557/1999
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court's decision concerning the application of the Civil Procedure Code and claims for unjust enrichment. The appellant argued for specific procedural interpretations and restitution, but the court found no merit in these arguments based on established legal principles. Consequently, the original judgment upholding the lower court's ruling was confirmed without modification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Kysymys oikeudenkäymiskaaren 25 luvun 14 §:n 2 momentin soveltamisesta; perusteettoman edun palauttamisesta: The court held that the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code regarding procedural conduct and the principles of unjust enrichment must be applied strictly to ensure legal certainty and prevent unjustified retention of benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code unjust enrichment procedural conduct Supreme Court appeal legal certainty restitution claim dismissed appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Kysymys oikeudenkäymiskaaren 25 luvun 14 §:n 2 momentin (1052/1991) soveltamisesta
Kysymys oikeudenkäymiskaaren 25 luvun 14 §:n 2 momentin (1052/1991) soveltamisesta.
perusteettoman edun palauttamisesta
Kysymys myös perusteettoman edun palauttamisesta.
AI generated
kko-precedent_2000_18
Supreme Court dismisses price reduction claim when buyer's insurance already covered the hidden defect repair costs.
kko-precedent_2007_8
Supreme Court dismisses claim for agent commission as consequential loss not covered by price reduction under Land Code.
kko-other_2002_2352
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding legal aid when client lost first instance civil damages case.
kko-precedent_2002_44
Buyers must compensate sellers for market-driven value loss when contract is rescinded for fundamental breach.
kko-precedent_1997_143
Supreme Court dismisses damages claim for undisclosed property liens as premature due to lack of enforcement actions.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys oikeudenkäymiskaaren 25 luvun 14 §:n 2 momentin (1052/1991) soveltamisesta. Kysymys myös perusteettoman edun palauttamisesta.