Supreme Court dismisses claim that a building attached to one co-owner's land burdens the other's share.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the claim that a building owned by one co-owner burdens the other's share of the land. The court found that since the building was constructed on the land owned by the claimant, it did not create a legal burden on the defendant's co-ownership share. Consequently, the defendant could not demand the removal of the structure based on this argument.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedSection 10 of the Act on the Ownership of Buildings; Section 10 of the Act on the Ownership of Buildings: A building constructed on land owned by one co-owner does not constitute a legal burden on the other co-owner's share of the land.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Aviopuolisot A ja B omistivat puoliksi A:n omistamalla tilalla olevan rakennuksen. Kysymys siitä, rasittiko kiinnitys B:n omistamaa osuutta tilalla olevasta rakennuksesta.