Supreme Court dismissed claim for compensation of mental reaction to police detention under Finnish Tort Liability Act.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages regarding a mental reaction suffered during police detention. The plaintiff argued that the detention caused severe psychological distress, while the state contended the procedure was lawful and proportionate. The court ruled that no liability existed because the plaintiff failed to prove the detention was unlawful or that the reaction was a direct result of an illegal act.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedSection 2 of the Act on Liability for Damages; Section 3 of the Act on Liability for Damages: A claim for damages for mental distress arising from lawful state detention is inadmissible unless the detention itself was unlawful or the distress resulted from a violation of the plaintiff's rights.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Kysymys masennusreaktion korvaamisesta.