Author entitled to remuneration for destroyed books where no agreement on destruction existed.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court ruled that the author was entitled to remuneration for the destroyed books. The publisher had destroyed the remaining stock without a prior agreement with the author regarding such destruction. The court held that the statutory right to remuneration for the work persists regardless of the publisher's unilateral decision to destroy the physical copies.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedAuthor's Act 1926, 100; Copyright Act 1961, 63: The statutory right to remuneration for the use of a work is not extinguished by the destruction of the physical copies of the work, provided no agreement was reached to waive this right.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kustantaja ja kirjan tekijä eivät olleet sopineet kirjojen hävittämisestä. Kustantaja oli hävittänyt jäännösvaraston. Kysymys siitä, oliko tekijä oikeutettu tekijänpalkkioon hävitettyjen kirjojen osalta.