Supreme Court dismisses director's liability claim due to procedural preclusion in lower court.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages against the company's managing director. The plaintiff argued the director caused loss through negligence, but the lower court had already rejected the claim based on preclusion rules. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, ruling that the plaintiff failed to pursue the claim within the required time limits.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedOYL 15 luku 1 §; OK 25 luku 14 § 2 mom: A claim for damages against a company director is barred if the plaintiff fails to file it within the statutory limitation period or if the lower court correctly applies preclusion rules.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kysymys osakeyhtiön toimitusjohtajan vahingonkorvausvastuusta ja sen toteuttamisesta. Kysymys tähän liittyen myös prekluusiosta hovioikeudessa.
OYL 15 luku 1 §
OK 25 luku 14 § 2 mom (1052/1991)