Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 29/1998 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses claim that car delivery violated consent, finding no self-help rights or privacy breaches occurred.

Case Number KKO 29/1998
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's claim regarding the unauthorized delivery of a car pledged as security for a debt. The applicant argued that the creditor's agents violated his consent and committed self-help, while also alleging breaches of peace and confidentiality laws. The court ruled that the delivery was lawful under the pledge agreement and found no evidence of illegal self-help or violations of the specified statutes.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

RL 16 luku 14 § 1 mom; RL 24 luku 1 § 1 mom; RL 24 luku 1 § 3 mom; L luottolaitostoiminnasta 94 § 1 mom (1607/93); L luottolaitostoiminnasta 100 §: The court held that delivery of pledged property pursuant to a valid agreement does not constitute self-help or violate peace or confidentiality provisions absent proof of illegality.

Keywords

AI generated
pledge agreement self-help rights peace disturbance confidentiality breach creditor's agents property delivery security interest

Cited Legislation

AI generated
RL 16 luku 14 § 1 mom
RL 24 luku 1 § 1 mom
RL 24 luku 1 § 3 mom
L luottolaitostoiminnasta 94 § 1 mom (1607/93)
L luottolaitostoiminnasta 94 § 1 mom (1607/93)
L luottolaitostoiminnasta 100 §
L luottolaitostoiminnasta 100 § (1607/93)
AI generated
appeal_1980_turku__2593
Court of Appeal upheld death sentence for racing driver; Supreme Court later acquitted him of negligence and damages.
appeal_1980_vaasa__1413
Court dismissed charge of handing over vehicle to drunk driver as defendant knew owner would drive drunk.
appeal_1976_turku__1247
Court convicts driver and passenger for failing to assist a cyclist after a traffic accident under Finnish traffic law.
kko-precedent_2009_13
Supreme Court allows repossession when borrower lends car to third party without seller's consent.
kko-precedent_1991_87
Supreme Court allows cyclist's partial compensation claim but dismisses criminal liability against the driver.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

X oli panttaussopimuksen perusteella ollut velvollinen luovuttamaan käteispantiksi lupaamansa auton velan vakuudeksi. Auton jäätyä hänen haltuunsa velkojan edustajat A ja B olivat käyneet noutamassa sen. Kysymys siitä, oliko X antanut suostumuksensa auton luovuttamiseen A:lle ja B:lle vai olivatko nämä syyllistyneet omankädenoikeuteen.

Kysymys myös kotirauhan rikkomisesta ja luottolaitosta koskevan salassapitovelvollisuuden rikkomisesta.

RL 16 luku 14 § 1 mom

RL 24 luku 1 § 1 mom

RL 24 luku 1 § 3 mom

L luottolaitostoiminnasta 94 § 1 mom (1607/93)

L luottolaitostoiminnasta 100 § (1607/93)