Supreme Court dismisses claim against employer for asbestos exposure compensation due to lack of statutory duty.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the employee's claim for compensation against the employer regarding asbestos exposure between 1945 and 1973. Although the employee suffered a confirmed asbestos-related illness, the court found no statutory obligation for the employer to compensate in this specific historical context. The decision rests on the absence of a legal duty to provide compensation for such occupational hazards during that period.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedAsbestilain 1 § ja 2 §: Asbestos-related occupational diseases do not automatically trigger employer liability for compensation if no specific statutory duty to compensate exists for the period of exposure.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Työntekijä oli vuosina 1945 - 1973 altistunut työssä asbestille, jonka seurauksena hänessä oli todettu asbestista johtuva sairaus.
Kysymys työnantajan korvausvastuusta.