Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 4420/1997 AI generated

Supreme Court rules bankruptcy administrator must investigate debt origin to determine pre-bankruptcy status for payment.

Case Number KKO 4420/1997
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the bankruptcy administrator's request to compel the lower court to investigate the origin of a debt. The administrator argued that debts arising after the bankruptcy filing could not be claimed by the administrator, while the lower court had only partially recognized the claim based on pre-bankruptcy timing. The court held that the administrator has a duty to verify the debt's formation date to ensure only pre-bankruptcy claims are paid. Consequently, the lower court was ordered to use its inquiry powers to determine the specific timeframe of the debt's creation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 10 of the Bankruptcy Act; Section 2 of the Code of Judicial Procedure: The bankruptcy administrator is obligated to investigate the origin of claims to distinguish between pre-bankruptcy and post-bankruptcy debts, and the lower court must exercise its inquiry powers to ascertain the factual basis of the claim.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy administrator duties pre-bankruptcy debt determination court inquiry powers claim origin investigation post-bankruptcy debt exclusion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 10 of the Bankruptcy Act
Section 2 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Lääninverovirasto oli yhtiön konkurssituomiossa annetun osoituksen mukaisesti vaatinut kanteessaan vahvistettavaksi, ettei A:lla ollut konkurssissa valvomiaan palkkasaatavia muun muassa sillä perusteella, ettei A voinut konkurssissa valvoa konkurssin alkamisen jälkeen syntynyttä saatavaa. Alemmat oikeudet olivat vahvistaneet maksettavaksi A:n valvoman palkkasaatavan "siltä osin kuin saaminen on konkurssia edeltävältä ajalta". Kysymys käräjäoikeuden velvollisuudesta kyselyoikeutta käyttäen selvittää, miltä osalta saatavan peruste oli syntynyt ennen konkurssin alkamista.